Tyanna Thomas 3B
3/30/2015 09:55:23 am
Yes because if i had invaded japan, there would have been many civilian causalities regardless but american soldiers would have died, Many people did die in Japan but i only wanted those two towns out because they had industries that supplied the military.
Reply
Charles Farr 1B
4/8/2015 12:00:50 am
No I wouldn't have, there could've been other solutions to the problem. Now we've got these other nations with Nukes and we're scared because of their threats.
Reply
Mr. Mainord
4/13/2015 12:29:30 pm
Nice
Reply
Giselle Ramirez 2A
4/13/2015 01:30:51 am
No I wouldn't. There could've been other solutions to the problem.
Reply
Audrie alexander 2a
4/13/2015 02:24:26 am
Yes, because if we the U.S. had invaded japan, there would have been many civilian causalities regardless but american soldiers would have died.Many people did die in Japan but i only wanted those two towns out because they had industries that supplied the military.
Reply
Keira Taylor 2a
4/13/2015 02:26:22 am
Yes because if we the U.S. had invaded japan, there would have been many civilian causalities regardless but american soldiers would have died, Many people did die in Japan but we the U.S. As a whole only wanted those two towns out because they had industries that supplied the military.
Reply
Mr. Mainord
4/13/2015 12:30:49 pm
Very original
Reply
Eva Ocampo 2A
4/13/2015 02:32:22 am
Yes, because they had industries that supplied the military.
Reply
Jessica Guerrero 2a
4/13/2015 02:33:32 am
No, I wouldn't have. I think if I did, it would just cause more and more drama and just might cause for things to get worse then what they were before.
Reply
Adely Aguirre 3a
4/13/2015 03:03:30 am
No, it could've done other solutions
Reply
Giselle ibanez
4/13/2015 03:06:13 am
towns out because they had industries that supplied the military.
Reply
Jasmine rowan
4/13/2015 03:08:24 am
no i wouldnt bc there could have been othwr ways to solve the problem. and now theres more weapons and bombs and nukes as if thats the only way to solve the problem
Reply
zyikia lowe
4/13/2015 03:09:27 am
No because if u it would be more than what it needs to be..there would have been more trouble and more bad things happing
Reply
Isaiah sing
4/13/2015 03:09:31 am
No,because there were other solutions that could've took place.
Reply
Brice Johnson 3a
4/13/2015 03:09:32 am
Yes,cause I wouldn't take a chance to get killed before we attacked
Reply
lorena alvarado 3A
4/13/2015 03:21:00 am
No, it would just cause more drama and just might cause for things to get worse then what they were before.
Reply
Isaac Resendiz
4/15/2015 03:07:07 am
Yes statistic wise the bomb was combat effective and cost the US less Soldiers to lose there lives. The Atomic Bomb introduce the importance of protecting our world
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
May 2015
Categories |